Talk:Faction Base Raped - Revision history

Ronillon: /* Best Wiki Article Award */ :::I know I know, but i could not help myself :D The whole Fallout was a huge collection of fun, so why not? -~~~~

2013-01-31T01:37:45Z

‎Best Wiki Article Award: :::I know I know, but i could not help myself :D The whole Fallout was a huge collection of fun, so why not? -~~~~

Ganado at 12:01, 14 June 2012

2012-06-14T12:01:48Z

Prof. Torr at 08:09, 14 June 2012

2012-06-14T08:09:09Z

Ganado: /* Best Wiki Article Award */ new section

2012-06-14T02:09:01Z

‎Best Wiki Article Award: new section

New page

== Best Wiki Article Award ==

This page is pointless, but full of lulz. :D I approve. --[[User:Ganado|Ganado]] ([[User talk:Ganado|talk]]) 04:09, 14 June 2012 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:37, 31 January 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:The page has been accessed 2,476 times since its creation (an average of roughly 6-7 hits a day) so I wouldn't call it pointless. There is plenty of room for improvement here, I agree, but even in its current state the article has ''something'' to offer - namely, a consolation to those <del>retarded</del> unfortunate enough to have their base(s) raped. [[User:Prof. Torr\|Prof. Torr]] ([[User talk:Prof. Torr\|talk]]) 10:09, 14 June 2012 (CEST)		:The page has been accessed 2,476 times since its creation (an average of roughly 6-7 hits a day) so I wouldn't call it pointless. There is plenty of room for improvement here, I agree, but even in its current state the article has ''something'' to offer - namely, a consolation to those <del>retarded</del> unfortunate enough to have their base(s) raped. [[User:Prof. Torr\|Prof. Torr]] ([[User talk:Prof. Torr\|talk]]) 10:09, 14 June 2012 (CEST)
	::Okay yes, pointless was wrong word. But the article and the thread it linked to was funny, hadn't seen it before. Most of those views are probably spambots. :P [[User:Ganado\|Ganado]] ([[User talk:Ganado\|talk]]) 14:01, 14 June 2012 (CEST)		::Okay yes, pointless was wrong word. But the article and the thread it linked to was funny, hadn't seen it before. Most of those views are probably spambots. :P [[User:Ganado\|Ganado]] ([[User talk:Ganado\|talk]]) 14:01, 14 June 2012 (CEST)
		+	:::I know I know, but i could not help myself :D The whole Fallout was a huge collection of fun, so why not? -[[User:Ronillon\|Ronillon]] ([[User talk:Ronillon\|talk]]) 02:37, 31 January 2013 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:01, 14 June 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:The page has been accessed 2,476 times since its creation (an average of roughly 6-7 hits a day) so I wouldn't call it pointless. There is plenty of room for improvement here, I agree, but even in its current state the article has ''something'' to offer - namely, a consolation to those <del>retarded</del> unfortunate enough to have their base(s) raped. [[User:Prof. Torr\|Prof. Torr]] ([[User talk:Prof. Torr\|talk]]) 10:09, 14 June 2012 (CEST)		:The page has been accessed 2,476 times since its creation (an average of roughly 6-7 hits a day) so I wouldn't call it pointless. There is plenty of room for improvement here, I agree, but even in its current state the article has ''something'' to offer - namely, a consolation to those <del>retarded</del> unfortunate enough to have their base(s) raped. [[User:Prof. Torr\|Prof. Torr]] ([[User talk:Prof. Torr\|talk]]) 10:09, 14 June 2012 (CEST)
		+	::Okay yes, pointless was wrong word. But the article and the thread it linked to was funny, hadn't seen it before. Most of those views are probably spambots. :P [[User:Ganado\|Ganado]] ([[User talk:Ganado\|talk]]) 14:01, 14 June 2012 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:09, 14 June 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:

	This page is pointless, but full of lulz. :D I approve. --[[User:Ganado\|Ganado]] ([[User talk:Ganado\|talk]]) 04:09, 14 June 2012 (CEST)		This page is pointless, but full of lulz. :D I approve. --[[User:Ganado\|Ganado]] ([[User talk:Ganado\|talk]]) 04:09, 14 June 2012 (CEST)
		+
		+	:The page has been accessed 2,476 times since its creation (an average of roughly 6-7 hits a day) so I wouldn't call it pointless. There is plenty of room for improvement here, I agree, but even in its current state the article has ''something'' to offer - namely, a consolation to those <del>retarded</del> unfortunate enough to have their base(s) raped. [[User:Prof. Torr\|Prof. Torr]] ([[User talk:Prof. Torr\|talk]]) 10:09, 14 June 2012 (CEST)