Talk:Magnetic Personality - Revision history

Prof. Torr: Pay no attention to this edit.

2012-05-21T17:12:54Z

Pay no attention to this edit.

Prof. Torr at 15:17, 16 May 2012

2012-05-16T15:17:30Z

Ronillon at 13:40, 16 May 2012

2012-05-16T13:40:46Z

Prof. Torr at 08:10, 16 May 2012

2012-05-16T08:10:41Z

Ganado: Created page with "So much drama. I believe this is the first time such "drama" has taken place on the wiki over such a small issue... but anyway, keep up the good work -- really, I love how people..."

2012-05-16T01:15:14Z

Created page with "So much drama. I believe this is the first time such "drama" has taken place on the wiki over such a small issue... but anyway, keep up the good work -- really, I love how people..."

New page

So much drama. I believe this is the first time such "drama" has taken place on the wiki over such a small issue... but anyway, keep up the good work -- really, I love how people are actually taking the initiative to update the wiki unlike back in like 2010 when the only person updating it was pretty much Izual -- but just don't be too concerned with small issues. Personally, I don't see the problem with the extra line, it might be redundant, but it paraphrases the in-game quote to clearly say what the perk does, so it brings no harm being there. --[[User:Ganado|Ganado]] 03:15, 16 May 2012 (CEST)

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 ::'''4)''' Maybe one day you will understand. For now, you'll just have to trust us
 ::'''5)''' Thanks for a good laugh
-::'''6)''' Good, you are making progress. From now on, try not to take things personally, and think before doing. Protip: don't modify any of my articles unless you have something useful to contribute, I am monitoring every single one of them and I will not allow anyone to flood them with redundancies
+::'''6)''' Good, you are making progress. From now on, try not to take things personally, and think before doing. Protip: don't modify any of my articles unless you have something useful to contribute; I am monitoring every single one of them and I will not allow anyone to flood them with redundancies
 ::[[User:Prof. Torr|Prof. Torr]] 17:17, 16 May 2012 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:17, 16 May 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:*I'm not going to start a war here, that is why i will stop reverting those changes. Please [[User:Ganado\|Ganado]] i'm leaving these articles in your hands. Do as you see it fit.		:*I'm not going to start a war here, that is why i will stop reverting those changes. Please [[User:Ganado\|Ganado]] i'm leaving these articles in your hands. Do as you see it fit.
	[[User:Ronillon\|Ronillon]] 15:40, 16 May 2012 (CEST)		[[User:Ronillon\|Ronillon]] 15:40, 16 May 2012 (CEST)
		+
		+	::'''1)''' Shame on your English teacher
		+	::'''2)''' You might want to compare the descriptions that do not match and see which one is better
		+	::'''3)''' If it did not duplicate the information that the sentence directly above it provided, I would agree
		+	::'''4)''' Maybe one day you will understand. For now, you'll just have to trust us
		+	::'''5)''' Thanks for a good laugh
		+	::'''6)''' Good, you are making progress. From now on, try not to take things personally, and think before doing. Protip: don't modify any of my articles unless you have something useful to contribute, I am monitoring every single one of them and I will not allow anyone to flood them with redundancies
		+	::[[User:Prof. Torr\|Prof. Torr]] 17:17, 16 May 2012 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:40, 16 May 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:''Redundant'' is the key word. Ronillon, seriously, quit being thick. Either the in-game description or what Ganado generously called your 'paraphrase' of it has to go; I don't care which one, but I will not let the article be littered with the same thing repeated over and over and over and over again.		:''Redundant'' is the key word. Ronillon, seriously, quit being thick. Either the in-game description or what Ganado generously called your 'paraphrase' of it has to go; I don't care which one, but I will not let the article be littered with the same thing repeated over and over and over and over again.
	:[[User:Prof. Torr\|Prof. Torr]] 10:10, 16 May 2012 (CEST)		:[[User:Prof. Torr\|Prof. Torr]] 10:10, 16 May 2012 (CEST)
		+
		+	:*I do not see anything wrong with redundancy.
		+	:*In-game description should stay, it's almost on every article. Yes, sometimes it's not entirelly correct (Let's hope it will be adjusted someday.). Thats why explanations and notes are needed.
		+	:*Effect explanation should stay, it clearly explains what the perk does.
		+	:*How can an article consisting of 5 sentences be littered anyhow, is beyond me.
		+	:*There are more important things to do, than argue with someone like [[User:Prof. Torr\|Prof. Torr]] about such small issues. We both have completely different ways of looking at things. And i'm sure our real life meeting would end up in blood.
		+	:*I'm not going to start a war here, that is why i will stop reverting those changes. Please [[User:Ganado\|Ganado]] i'm leaving these articles in your hands. Do as you see it fit.
		+	[[User:Ronillon\|Ronillon]] 15:40, 16 May 2012 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:10, 16 May 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So much drama. I believe this is the first time such "drama" has taken place on the wiki over such a small issue... but anyway, keep up the good work -- really, I love how people are actually taking the initiative to update the wiki unlike back in like 2010 when the only person updating it was pretty much Izual -- but just don't be too concerned with small issues. Personally, I don't see the problem with the extra line, it might be redundant, but it paraphrases the in-game quote to clearly say what the perk does, so it brings no harm being there. --[[User:Ganado\|Ganado]] 03:15, 16 May 2012 (CEST)		So much drama. I believe this is the first time such "drama" has taken place on the wiki over such a small issue... but anyway, keep up the good work -- really, I love how people are actually taking the initiative to update the wiki unlike back in like 2010 when the only person updating it was pretty much Izual -- but just don't be too concerned with small issues. Personally, I don't see the problem with the extra line, it might be redundant, but it paraphrases the in-game quote to clearly say what the perk does, so it brings no harm being there. --[[User:Ganado\|Ganado]] 03:15, 16 May 2012 (CEST)
		+	:''Redundant'' is the key word. Ronillon, seriously, quit being thick. Either the in-game description or what Ganado generously called your 'paraphrase' of it has to go; I don't care which one, but I will not let the article be littered with the same thing repeated over and over and over and over again.
		+	:[[User:Prof. Torr\|Prof. Torr]] 10:10, 16 May 2012 (CEST)