Talk:Radiated - Revision history

Wipe at 12:16, 14 December 2012

2012-12-14T12:16:39Z

Marko at 18:28, 7 June 2012

2012-06-07T18:28:48Z

Marko at 18:23, 31 May 2012

2012-05-31T18:23:05Z

Marko at 18:21, 31 May 2012

2012-05-31T18:21:59Z

Marko at 17:58, 31 May 2012

2012-05-31T17:58:56Z

Ronillon at 11:19, 31 May 2012

2012-05-31T11:19:05Z

Prof. Torr at 10:00, 31 May 2012

2012-05-31T10:00:16Z

Prof. Torr at 07:58, 9 May 2012

2012-05-09T07:58:32Z

Ganado: Created page with "1. Someone with the knowledge should check all the ways as to what exactly causes the radiation. Obviously, going in the map cause cause it, but I heard that just standing in enc..."

2012-05-08T19:56:02Z

Created page with "1. Someone with the knowledge should check all the ways as to what exactly causes the radiation. Obviously, going in the map cause cause it, but I heard that just standing in enc..."

New page

1. Someone with the knowledge should check all the ways as to what exactly causes the radiation. Obviously, going in the map cause cause it, but I heard that just standing in encounters near the Glow or the post-Cathedral Crater can give the radiated status as well. Possibly just by staying on the world map, but I'm even less sure of this. <br>
2. Also, in reply to "if you feel the need to rewrite something that doesn't need rewriting, at least do it in proper English, thanks." -- Jovanka's description was more clear that just saying "the wrong place"... you should stop being rude. <br>
3. I am pretty sure that Fruit is the only consumable that gives radiation, so the e.g. is most likely unnecessary. But I am not sure of this. It would probably best to give every scenario where one can get radiation, anyway. Some of my thoughts. --[[User:Ganado|Ganado]] 21:56, 8 May 2012 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:16, 14 December 2012
Line 14:		Line 14:

	'''UPDATE''': I have confirmed some info about radiation poisoning. 50/200 are the correct numbers. Additionally, one loses 4 SPECIAL points somewhere between 365 and 390 rads, so i am guessing at 375. Again, i'll keep watching this and make micro-corrections as needed. [[User:Marko\|Marko]] ([[User talk:Marko\|talk]]) 13:27, 07 June 2012 (CST)		'''UPDATE''': I have confirmed some info about radiation poisoning. 50/200 are the correct numbers. Additionally, one loses 4 SPECIAL points somewhere between 365 and 390 rads, so i am guessing at 375. Again, i'll keep watching this and make micro-corrections as needed. [[User:Marko\|Marko]] ([[User talk:Marko\|talk]]) 13:27, 07 June 2012 (CST)
		+
		+
		+	"treatment from one of the NPC doctors at a cost equal to 50 caps multiplied by the level of the player undergoing the treatment"
		+	* It's: ''radiation level + 100'' -[[User:Wipe\|Wipe]] 13:16, 14 December 2012 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:28, 7 June 2012
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Hey thanks for asking - i got heavily radiated and deducted these numbers by paying attention to changes as i reduced my rads using [[RadAway]]: It took 1 RadAway (and went AFK) which reduced my rads by 150 and which restored my SPECIAL but both indicators were still on. The next RadAway removed 25 more rads and the main indicator, then the remaining 42 rads and the minor indicator. Thus was able to conclude that the 2nd indicator comes on somewhere between 42 and 67. The most reasonable guess is 50. Once Geiger counters are fixed, i will edit this if it turns out i am wrong. -Marko		Hey thanks for asking - i got heavily radiated and deducted these numbers by paying attention to changes as i reduced my rads using [[RadAway]]: It took 1 RadAway (and went AFK) which reduced my rads by 150 and which restored my SPECIAL but both indicators were still on. The next RadAway removed 25 more rads and the main indicator, then the remaining 42 rads and the minor indicator. Thus was able to conclude that the 2nd indicator comes on somewhere between 42 and 67. The most reasonable guess is 50. Once Geiger counters are fixed, i will edit this if it turns out i am wrong. -Marko
		+
		+	'''UPDATE''': I have confirmed some info about radiation poisoning. 50/200 are the correct numbers. Additionally, one loses 4 SPECIAL points somewhere between 365 and 390 rads, so i am guessing at 375. Again, i'll keep watching this and make micro-corrections as needed. [[User:Marko\|Marko]] ([[User talk:Marko\|talk]]) 13:27, 07 June 2012 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:23, 31 May 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:I guess he made a fresh alt, and ate some [[Fruit]]s. They give +1 [[Current Radiation Level]]. [[User:Ronillon\|Ronillon]] ([[User talk:Ronillon\|talk]]) 13:19, 31 May 2012 (CEST)		:I guess he made a fresh alt, and ate some [[Fruit]]s. They give +1 [[Current Radiation Level]]. [[User:Ronillon\|Ronillon]] ([[User talk:Ronillon\|talk]]) 13:19, 31 May 2012 (CEST)

−	Hey thanks for asking - i got heavily radiated and deducted these numbers by paying attention to changes as i reduced my rads using [[RadAway]]: It took 1 RadAway ~~to reduce~~ my rads by 150 which restored my SPECIAL but both indicators were still on. The next RadAway removed 25 more rads and the main indicator, then the remaining 42 rads and the minor indicator. Thus was able to conclude that the 2nd indicator comes on somewhere between 42 and 67. The most reasonable guess is 50. Once Geiger counters are fixed, i will edit this if it turns out i am wrong. -Marko	+	Hey thanks for asking - i got heavily radiated and deducted these numbers by paying attention to changes as i reduced my rads using [[RadAway]]: It took 1 RadAway (and went AFK) which reduced my rads by 150 and which restored my SPECIAL but both indicators were still on. The next RadAway removed 25 more rads and the main indicator, then the remaining 42 rads and the minor indicator. Thus was able to conclude that the 2nd indicator comes on somewhere between 42 and 67. The most reasonable guess is 50. Once Geiger counters are fixed, i will edit this if it turns out i am wrong. -Marko

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:21, 31 May 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:I guess he made a fresh alt, and ate some [[Fruit]]s. They give +1 [[Current Radiation Level]]. [[User:Ronillon\|Ronillon]] ([[User talk:Ronillon\|talk]]) 13:19, 31 May 2012 (CEST)		:I guess he made a fresh alt, and ate some [[Fruit]]s. They give +1 [[Current Radiation Level]]. [[User:Ronillon\|Ronillon]] ([[User talk:Ronillon\|talk]]) 13:19, 31 May 2012 (CEST)

−	Hey thanks for asking - i got heavily radiated and deducted these numbers by paying attention to changes as i reduced my rads using [[RadAway]]. ~~I only had to assume~~ the ~~right numbers are logical numbers~~, and ~~not weird numbers like 52 or something~~. ~~So technically it is possible~~ that the ~~right two numbers are 55~~ and ~~205 but i think it's logical to assume they~~ are ~~rounder than that. If a dev will provide verification~~, ~~then~~ i~~'ll make corrections as needed. Otherwise~~ i ~~draw a line at making guesses and only post info that i'm reasonably very sure about. No fruits were injured in the posting of this data~~. -Marko	+	Hey thanks for asking - i got heavily radiated and deducted these numbers by paying attention to changes as i reduced my rads using [[RadAway]]: It took 1 RadAway to reduce my rads by 150 which restored my SPECIAL but both indicators were still on. The next RadAway removed 25 more rads and the main indicator, then the remaining 42 rads and the minor indicator. Thus was able to conclude that the 2nd indicator comes on somewhere between 42 and 67. The most reasonable guess is 50. Once Geiger counters are fixed, i will edit this if it turns out i am wrong. -Marko

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:58, 31 May 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Marko, where did you get the numbers from? (50/200 rads) [[User:Prof. Torr\|Prof. Torr]] ([[User talk:Prof. Torr\|talk]]) 12:00, 31 May 2012 (CEST)		Marko, where did you get the numbers from? (50/200 rads) [[User:Prof. Torr\|Prof. Torr]] ([[User talk:Prof. Torr\|talk]]) 12:00, 31 May 2012 (CEST)
	:I guess he made a fresh alt, and ate some [[Fruit]]s. They give +1 [[Current Radiation Level]]. [[User:Ronillon\|Ronillon]] ([[User talk:Ronillon\|talk]]) 13:19, 31 May 2012 (CEST)		:I guess he made a fresh alt, and ate some [[Fruit]]s. They give +1 [[Current Radiation Level]]. [[User:Ronillon\|Ronillon]] ([[User talk:Ronillon\|talk]]) 13:19, 31 May 2012 (CEST)
		+
		+	Hey thanks for asking - i got heavily radiated and deducted these numbers by paying attention to changes as i reduced my rads using [[RadAway]]. I only had to assume the right numbers are logical numbers, and not weird numbers like 52 or something. So technically it is possible that the right two numbers are 55 and 205 but i think it's logical to assume they are rounder than that. If a dev will provide verification, then i'll make corrections as needed. Otherwise i draw a line at making guesses and only post info that i'm reasonably very sure about. No fruits were injured in the posting of this data. -Marko

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:19, 31 May 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:Â		:Â
	Marko, where did you get the numbers from? (50/200 rads) [[User:Prof. Torr\|Prof. Torr]] ([[User talk:Prof. Torr\|talk]]) 12:00, 31 May 2012 (CEST)		Marko, where did you get the numbers from? (50/200 rads) [[User:Prof. Torr\|Prof. Torr]] ([[User talk:Prof. Torr\|talk]]) 12:00, 31 May 2012 (CEST)
		+	:I guess he made a fresh alt, and ate some [[Fruit]]s. They give +1 [[Current Radiation Level]]. [[User:Ronillon\|Ronillon]] ([[User talk:Ronillon\|talk]]) 13:19, 31 May 2012 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:00, 31 May 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:'''3)''' An update may come any second and more radioactive eatables might be added; by listing fruit as only one example, we account for that possibility ensuring that no further changes to the article are needed should that be the case. Plus, doesn't drinking booze/gamma gulp beer give you a few rads?		:'''3)''' An update may come any second and more radioactive eatables might be added; by listing fruit as only one example, we account for that possibility ensuring that no further changes to the article are needed should that be the case. Plus, doesn't drinking booze/gamma gulp beer give you a few rads?
	:[[User:Prof. Torr\|Prof. Torr]] 09:58, 9 May 2012 (CEST)		:[[User:Prof. Torr\|Prof. Torr]] 09:58, 9 May 2012 (CEST)
		+	:Â
		+	Marko, where did you get the numbers from? (50/200 rads) [[User:Prof. Torr\|Prof. Torr]] ([[User talk:Prof. Torr\|talk]]) 12:00, 31 May 2012 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:58, 9 May 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:
	2. Also, in reply to "if you feel the need to rewrite something that doesn't need rewriting, at least do it in proper English, thanks." -- Jovanka's description was more clear that just saying "the wrong place"... you should stop being rude. <br>		2. Also, in reply to "if you feel the need to rewrite something that doesn't need rewriting, at least do it in proper English, thanks." -- Jovanka's description was more clear that just saying "the wrong place"... you should stop being rude. <br>
	3. I am pretty sure that Fruit is the only consumable that gives radiation, so the e.g. is most likely unnecessary. But I am not sure of this. It would probably best to give every scenario where one can get radiation, anyway. Some of my thoughts. --[[User:Ganado\|Ganado]] 21:56, 8 May 2012 (CEST)		3. I am pretty sure that Fruit is the only consumable that gives radiation, so the e.g. is most likely unnecessary. But I am not sure of this. It would probably best to give every scenario where one can get radiation, anyway. Some of my thoughts. --[[User:Ganado\|Ganado]] 21:56, 8 May 2012 (CEST)
		+
		+	:'''1)''' That is all correct, and goes under the common label of 'visiting the wrong place'
		+	:'''2)''' Frankness â‰ rudeness
		+	:'''3)''' An update may come any second and more radioactive eatables might be added; by listing fruit as only one example, we account for that possibility ensuring that no further changes to the article are needed should that be the case. Plus, doesn't drinking booze/gamma gulp beer give you a few rads?
		+	:[[User:Prof. Torr\|Prof. Torr]] 09:58, 9 May 2012 (CEST)