Talk:Slavery
From FOnline: 2238 Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(discussion - brahmin isn't part of slavery) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Macken, no offense, but I don't think brahmin belongs in "Slavery" page. And for that matter, any animals that may be able to be tamed in the future. I say this because: | Macken, no offense, but I don't think brahmin belongs in "Slavery" page. And for that matter, any animals that may be able to be tamed in the future. I say this because: | ||
*You do not need to be a slaver to be able to tame a brahmin, so it really has no purpose being in a slavery page. | *You do not need to be a slaver to be able to tame a brahmin, so it really has no purpose being in a slavery page. | ||
− | *You ''could'' find some sort of way to link brahmin to this article, but the current way you have it doesn't make much sense, because the matter of taming brahmin really has nothing to do with slavery. --[[User:Ganado|Ganado]] 02:08, 25 March 2011 (UTC) | + | *You ''could'' find some sort of way to link brahmin to this article, but the current way you have it doesn't make much sense, because the matter of taming brahmin really has nothing to do with slavery. |
+ | I would suggest adding an "also see" section, or something like that, and link it to brahmin that way. --[[User:Ganado|Ganado]] 02:08, 25 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
: | : |
Latest revision as of 03:09, 25 March 2011
Macken, no offense, but I don't think brahmin belongs in "Slavery" page. And for that matter, any animals that may be able to be tamed in the future. I say this because:
- You do not need to be a slaver to be able to tame a brahmin, so it really has no purpose being in a slavery page.
- You could find some sort of way to link brahmin to this article, but the current way you have it doesn't make much sense, because the matter of taming brahmin really has nothing to do with slavery.
I would suggest adding an "also see" section, or something like that, and link it to brahmin that way. --Ganado 02:08, 25 March 2011 (UTC)