Talk:Magnetic Personality
From FOnline: 2238 Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Prof. Torr (Talk | contribs) |
Prof. Torr (Talk | contribs) m (Pay no attention to this edit.) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:''Redundant'' is the key word. Ronillon, seriously, quit being thick. Either the in-game description or what Ganado generously called your 'paraphrase' of it has to go; I don't care which one, but I will not let the article be littered with the same thing repeated over and over and over and over again. | :''Redundant'' is the key word. Ronillon, seriously, quit being thick. Either the in-game description or what Ganado generously called your 'paraphrase' of it has to go; I don't care which one, but I will not let the article be littered with the same thing repeated over and over and over and over again. | ||
:[[User:Prof. Torr|Prof. Torr]] 10:10, 16 May 2012 (CEST) | :[[User:Prof. Torr|Prof. Torr]] 10:10, 16 May 2012 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :*I do not see anything wrong with redundancy. | ||
| + | :*In-game description should stay, it's almost on every article. Yes, sometimes it's not entirelly correct (Let's hope it will be adjusted someday.). Thats why explanations and notes are needed. | ||
| + | :*Effect explanation should stay, it clearly explains what the perk does. | ||
| + | :*How can an article consisting of 5 sentences be littered anyhow, is beyond me. | ||
| + | :*There are more important things to do, than argue with someone like [[User:Prof. Torr|Prof. Torr]] about such small issues. We both have completely different ways of looking at things. And i'm sure our real life meeting would end up in blood. | ||
| + | :*I'm not going to start a war here, that is why i will stop reverting those changes. Please [[User:Ganado|Ganado]] i'm leaving these articles in your hands. Do as you see it fit. | ||
| + | [[User:Ronillon|Ronillon]] 15:40, 16 May 2012 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::'''1)''' Shame on your English teacher | ||
| + | ::'''2)''' You might want to compare the descriptions that do not match and see which one is better | ||
| + | ::'''3)''' If it did not duplicate the information that the sentence directly above it provided, I would agree | ||
| + | ::'''4)''' Maybe one day you will understand. For now, you'll just have to trust us | ||
| + | ::'''5)''' Thanks for a good laugh | ||
| + | ::'''6)''' Good, you are making progress. From now on, try not to take things personally, and think before doing. Protip: don't modify any of my articles unless you have something useful to contribute; I am monitoring every single one of them and I will not allow anyone to flood them with redundancies | ||
| + | ::[[User:Prof. Torr|Prof. Torr]] 17:17, 16 May 2012 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:12, 21 May 2012
So much drama. I believe this is the first time such "drama" has taken place on the wiki over such a small issue... but anyway, keep up the good work -- really, I love how people are actually taking the initiative to update the wiki unlike back in like 2010 when the only person updating it was pretty much Izual -- but just don't be too concerned with small issues. Personally, I don't see the problem with the extra line, it might be redundant, but it paraphrases the in-game quote to clearly say what the perk does, so it brings no harm being there. --Ganado 03:15, 16 May 2012 (CEST)
- Redundant is the key word. Ronillon, seriously, quit being thick. Either the in-game description or what Ganado generously called your 'paraphrase' of it has to go; I don't care which one, but I will not let the article be littered with the same thing repeated over and over and over and over again.
- Prof. Torr 10:10, 16 May 2012 (CEST)
- I do not see anything wrong with redundancy.
- In-game description should stay, it's almost on every article. Yes, sometimes it's not entirelly correct (Let's hope it will be adjusted someday.). Thats why explanations and notes are needed.
- Effect explanation should stay, it clearly explains what the perk does.
- How can an article consisting of 5 sentences be littered anyhow, is beyond me.
- There are more important things to do, than argue with someone like Prof. Torr about such small issues. We both have completely different ways of looking at things. And i'm sure our real life meeting would end up in blood.
- I'm not going to start a war here, that is why i will stop reverting those changes. Please Ganado i'm leaving these articles in your hands. Do as you see it fit.
Ronillon 15:40, 16 May 2012 (CEST)
- 1) Shame on your English teacher
- 2) You might want to compare the descriptions that do not match and see which one is better
- 3) If it did not duplicate the information that the sentence directly above it provided, I would agree
- 4) Maybe one day you will understand. For now, you'll just have to trust us
- 5) Thanks for a good laugh
- 6) Good, you are making progress. From now on, try not to take things personally, and think before doing. Protip: don't modify any of my articles unless you have something useful to contribute; I am monitoring every single one of them and I will not allow anyone to flood them with redundancies
- Prof. Torr 17:17, 16 May 2012 (CEST)
