Talk:Faction Base Raped

From FOnline: 2238 Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
:The page has been accessed 2,476 times since its creation (an average of roughly 6-7 hits a day) so I wouldn't call it pointless. There is plenty of room for improvement here, I agree, but even in its current state the article has ''something'' to offer - namely, a consolation to those <del>retarded</del> unfortunate enough to have their base(s) raped. [[User:Prof. Torr|Prof. Torr]] ([[User talk:Prof. Torr|talk]]) 10:09, 14 June 2012 (CEST)
 
:The page has been accessed 2,476 times since its creation (an average of roughly 6-7 hits a day) so I wouldn't call it pointless. There is plenty of room for improvement here, I agree, but even in its current state the article has ''something'' to offer - namely, a consolation to those <del>retarded</del> unfortunate enough to have their base(s) raped. [[User:Prof. Torr|Prof. Torr]] ([[User talk:Prof. Torr|talk]]) 10:09, 14 June 2012 (CEST)
 +
::Okay yes, pointless was wrong word. But the article and the thread it linked to was funny, hadn't seen it before. Most of those views are probably spambots. :P [[User:Ganado|Ganado]] ([[User talk:Ganado|talk]]) 14:01, 14 June 2012 (CEST)

Revision as of 13:01, 14 June 2012

Best Wiki Article Award

This page is pointless, but full of lulz. :D I approve. --Ganado (talk) 04:09, 14 June 2012 (CEST)

The page has been accessed 2,476 times since its creation (an average of roughly 6-7 hits a day) so I wouldn't call it pointless. There is plenty of room for improvement here, I agree, but even in its current state the article has something to offer - namely, a consolation to those retarded unfortunate enough to have their base(s) raped. Prof. Torr (talk) 10:09, 14 June 2012 (CEST)
Okay yes, pointless was wrong word. But the article and the thread it linked to was funny, hadn't seen it before. Most of those views are probably spambots. :P Ganado (talk) 14:01, 14 June 2012 (CEST)
Personal tools
Contribute