Talk:Quests
(→Design) |
(→Quest name) |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
'''Requirements:''' what need to be done, what the player need to be or to have to start this quest. | '''Requirements:''' what need to be done, what the player need to be or to have to start this quest. | ||
+ | |||
'''Reward:''' short list of what the players can get (faction, items, cash, experience, access..) | '''Reward:''' short list of what the players can get (faction, items, cash, experience, access..) |
Revision as of 10:05, 23 December 2009
Quest table?
what's the purpose of quest table? --Touriste 18:13, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
You're supposed to fill it :p --Ghosthack 18:15, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Yeah but with what? That's Izual's idea :p --Touriste 18:23, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Design
I suggest that with use the same pattern to explain quest. I suggest this one:
== Quest name == Description with '''npc name in bold''' and ''location in italic''. If the quest has: * some steps, * different ways to perform it * or a series of actions in no specific order, wiki list should be use like above. '''Requirements:''' what need to be done, what the player need to be or to have to start this quest. '''Reward:''' short list of what the players can get (faction, items, cash, experience, access..)
Which gives us:
Quest name
Description with npc name in bold and location in italic. If the quest has:
- some steps,
- different ways to perform it
- or a series of actions in no specific order,
wiki list should be use like above.
Requirements: what need to be done, what the player need to be or to have to start this quest.
Reward: short list of what the players can get (faction, items, cash, experience, access..)