Talk:Magnetic Personality
From FOnline: 2238 Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "So much drama. I believe this is the first time such "drama" has taken place on the wiki over such a small issue... but anyway, keep up the good work -- really, I love how people...") |
Prof. Torr (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So much drama. I believe this is the first time such "drama" has taken place on the wiki over such a small issue... but anyway, keep up the good work -- really, I love how people are actually taking the initiative to update the wiki unlike back in like 2010 when the only person updating it was pretty much Izual -- but just don't be too concerned with small issues. Personally, I don't see the problem with the extra line, it might be redundant, but it paraphrases the in-game quote to clearly say what the perk does, so it brings no harm being there. --[[User:Ganado|Ganado]] 03:15, 16 May 2012 (CEST) | So much drama. I believe this is the first time such "drama" has taken place on the wiki over such a small issue... but anyway, keep up the good work -- really, I love how people are actually taking the initiative to update the wiki unlike back in like 2010 when the only person updating it was pretty much Izual -- but just don't be too concerned with small issues. Personally, I don't see the problem with the extra line, it might be redundant, but it paraphrases the in-game quote to clearly say what the perk does, so it brings no harm being there. --[[User:Ganado|Ganado]] 03:15, 16 May 2012 (CEST) | ||
+ | :''Redundant'' is the key word. Ronillon, seriously, quit being thick. Either the in-game description or what Ganado generously called your 'paraphrase' of it has to go; I don't care which one, but I will not let the article be littered with the same thing repeated over and over and over and over again. | ||
+ | :[[User:Prof. Torr|Prof. Torr]] 10:10, 16 May 2012 (CEST) |
Revision as of 09:10, 16 May 2012
So much drama. I believe this is the first time such "drama" has taken place on the wiki over such a small issue... but anyway, keep up the good work -- really, I love how people are actually taking the initiative to update the wiki unlike back in like 2010 when the only person updating it was pretty much Izual -- but just don't be too concerned with small issues. Personally, I don't see the problem with the extra line, it might be redundant, but it paraphrases the in-game quote to clearly say what the perk does, so it brings no harm being there. --Ganado 03:15, 16 May 2012 (CEST)
- Redundant is the key word. Ronillon, seriously, quit being thick. Either the in-game description or what Ganado generously called your 'paraphrase' of it has to go; I don't care which one, but I will not let the article be littered with the same thing repeated over and over and over and over again.
- Prof. Torr 10:10, 16 May 2012 (CEST)