Talk:Faction Base Raped
From FOnline: 2238 Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
m (→Best Wiki Article Award: :::I know I know, but i could not help myself :D The whole Fallout was a huge collection of fun, so why not? -~~~~) |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:The page has been accessed 2,476 times since its creation (an average of roughly 6-7 hits a day) so I wouldn't call it pointless. There is plenty of room for improvement here, I agree, but even in its current state the article has ''something'' to offer - namely, a consolation to those <del>retarded</del> unfortunate enough to have their base(s) raped. [[User:Prof. Torr|Prof. Torr]] ([[User talk:Prof. Torr|talk]]) 10:09, 14 June 2012 (CEST) | :The page has been accessed 2,476 times since its creation (an average of roughly 6-7 hits a day) so I wouldn't call it pointless. There is plenty of room for improvement here, I agree, but even in its current state the article has ''something'' to offer - namely, a consolation to those <del>retarded</del> unfortunate enough to have their base(s) raped. [[User:Prof. Torr|Prof. Torr]] ([[User talk:Prof. Torr|talk]]) 10:09, 14 June 2012 (CEST) | ||
::Okay yes, pointless was wrong word. But the article and the thread it linked to was funny, hadn't seen it before. Most of those views are probably spambots. :P [[User:Ganado|Ganado]] ([[User talk:Ganado|talk]]) 14:01, 14 June 2012 (CEST) | ::Okay yes, pointless was wrong word. But the article and the thread it linked to was funny, hadn't seen it before. Most of those views are probably spambots. :P [[User:Ganado|Ganado]] ([[User talk:Ganado|talk]]) 14:01, 14 June 2012 (CEST) | ||
+ | :::I know I know, but i could not help myself :D The whole Fallout was a huge collection of fun, so why not? -[[User:Ronillon|Ronillon]] ([[User talk:Ronillon|talk]]) 02:37, 31 January 2013 (CET) |
Latest revision as of 02:37, 31 January 2013
[edit] Best Wiki Article Award
This page is pointless, but full of lulz. :D I approve. --Ganado (talk) 04:09, 14 June 2012 (CEST)
- The page has been accessed 2,476 times since its creation (an average of roughly 6-7 hits a day) so I wouldn't call it pointless. There is plenty of room for improvement here, I agree, but even in its current state the article has something to offer - namely, a consolation to those
retardedunfortunate enough to have their base(s) raped. Prof. Torr (talk) 10:09, 14 June 2012 (CEST)