Talk:Quests
m (→Removed Shoveling Poo) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* You can expect this change to be undone. poo is in that list because it's a job, aka an assignment from an NPC that earns caps. -[[User:Marko|Marko]] 21 March 2013 | * You can expect this change to be undone. poo is in that list because it's a job, aka an assignment from an NPC that earns caps. -[[User:Marko|Marko]] 21 March 2013 | ||
* You should add those locations that are missing, rather than deleting those, that are listed. Note there are other locations apart from towns. -[[User:Ronillon|Ronillon]] ([[User talk:Ronillon|talk]]) 05:33, 22 March 2013 (CET) | * You should add those locations that are missing, rather than deleting those, that are listed. Note there are other locations apart from towns. -[[User:Ronillon|Ronillon]] ([[User talk:Ronillon|talk]]) 05:33, 22 March 2013 (CET) | ||
| + | * As Marko said, it's a job not quest (repeatable, it's obvious what to do, earns you caps), probably they should be kept separately not in quests --[[User:JovankaB|JovankaB]] ([[User talk:JovankaB|talk]]) 14:15, 22 March 2013 (CET) | ||
= Quest table? = | = Quest table? = | ||
Revision as of 14:15, 22 March 2013
Contents |
Removed Shoveling Poo
I dont think this can be called quest. Also you can do this at each city so it doesnt have sense to list only Hub and NRC. Lambhelt 18:32, 21 March 2013
- You can expect this change to be undone. poo is in that list because it's a job, aka an assignment from an NPC that earns caps. -Marko 21 March 2013
- You should add those locations that are missing, rather than deleting those, that are listed. Note there are other locations apart from towns. -Ronillon (talk) 05:33, 22 March 2013 (CET)
- As Marko said, it's a job not quest (repeatable, it's obvious what to do, earns you caps), probably they should be kept separately not in quests --JovankaB (talk) 14:15, 22 March 2013 (CET)
Quest table?
what's the purpose of quest table? --Touriste 18:13, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
You're supposed to fill it :p --Ghosthack 18:15, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Yeah but with what? That's Izual's idea :p --Touriste 18:23, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Design
I suggest that with use the same pattern to explain quest. I suggest this one:
== Quest name == Description with '''npc name in bold''' and ''location in italic''. If the quest has: * some steps, * different ways to perform it * or a series of actions in no specific order, wiki list should be use like above. '''Requirements:''' what need to be done, what the player need to be or to have to start this quest. '''Reward:''' short list of what the players can get (faction, items, cash, experience, access..)
Which gives us:
Quest name
Description with npc name in bold and location in italic. If the quest has:
- some steps,
- different ways to perform it
- or a series of actions in no specific order,
wiki list should be use like above.
Requirements: what need to be done, what the player need to be or to have to start this quest.
Reward: short list of what the players can get (faction, items, cash, experience, access..)
--Touriste 09:08, 23 December 2009 (UTC) __________________________________________________________
The following quests require more detailed description:
BoS: Investigate the red object; Bring 10 Radscorpion Tails; Surveillance missions; Rescue missions
The Hub: Iguana Pete's Missing Son
