Talk:Quests
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | = Quest table? = | ||
| + | |||
what's the purpose of quest table? --[[User:Touriste|Touriste]] 18:13, 22 December 2009 (UTC) | what's the purpose of quest table? --[[User:Touriste|Touriste]] 18:13, 22 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Line 4: | Line 6: | ||
Yeah but with what? That's Izual's idea :p --[[User:Touriste|Touriste]] 18:23, 22 December 2009 (UTC) | Yeah but with what? That's Izual's idea :p --[[User:Touriste|Touriste]] 18:23, 22 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | = Design = | ||
| + | |||
| + | I suggest that with use the same pattern to explain quest. I suggest this one: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <nowiki> | ||
| + | == Quest name == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Description with '''npc name in bold''' and ''location in italic''. | ||
| + | If the quest has: | ||
| + | * some steps, | ||
| + | * different ways to perform it | ||
| + | * or a series of actions in no specific order, | ||
| + | wiki list should be use like above. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Requirements:''' what need to be done, what the player need to be or to have to start this quest. | ||
| + | '''Reward:''' short list of what the players can get (faction, items, cash, experience, access..) | ||
| + | </nowiki> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Which gives us: | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Quest name == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Description with '''npc name in bold''' and ''location in italic''. | ||
| + | If the quest has: | ||
| + | * some steps, | ||
| + | * different ways to perform it | ||
| + | * or a series of actions in no specific order, | ||
| + | wiki list should be use like above. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Requirements:''' what need to be done, what the player need to be or to have to start this quest. | ||
| + | '''Reward:''' short list of what the players can get (faction, items, cash, experience, access..) | ||
Revision as of 10:02, 23 December 2009
Quest table?
what's the purpose of quest table? --Touriste 18:13, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
You're supposed to fill it :p --Ghosthack 18:15, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Yeah but with what? That's Izual's idea :p --Touriste 18:23, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Design
I suggest that with use the same pattern to explain quest. I suggest this one:
== Quest name == Description with '''npc name in bold''' and ''location in italic''. If the quest has: * some steps, * different ways to perform it * or a series of actions in no specific order, wiki list should be use like above. '''Requirements:''' what need to be done, what the player need to be or to have to start this quest. '''Reward:''' short list of what the players can get (faction, items, cash, experience, access..)
Which gives us:
== Quest name ==
Description with npc name in bold and location in italic. If the quest has:
- some steps,
- different ways to perform it
- or a series of actions in no specific order,
wiki list should be use like above.
Requirements: what need to be done, what the player need to be or to have to start this quest. Reward: short list of what the players can get (faction, items, cash, experience, access..)
