User talk:Prof. Torr
http://fonline2238.net/wiki/index.php?title=Weakness&curid=6300&diff=21290&oldid=21289
Lets talk about this.
1) "when in doubt about any aspect of any article, use the discussion page to ask your questions, not the article itself LOL"
It's not really a question. It's more like information for visitors. I let them know, that info is not entirely correct. In fact, we provide them most recent info we have, so they can find out, for them selves. And maybe, one day, post update on wiki.
When speaking about it, devs should have put "Outdated" on every page, after a wipe and massive update.
How about a link to discussion page saying: "Some information on this page are a subject of discussion on discussion page"
2) "To ensure the successful healing of an n-level player's weakness, the healer's Doctor skill must be higher than or equal to 10%×n."
It might be my poor english, but it feels like i have no chance, of healing weakeness when my DOC skill is lower, than 10%xN.
3) And for the "question" on http://fonline2238.net/wiki/Talk:Weakness you can just put those informations, to articles, where they belong.
- 1) "It's not really a question"
- If it does not provide the reader with any information whatsoever, it is superfluous and should be removed from the article, irrespective of whether it is a question or a statement, or whatever.
- 2) To ensure = to make sure or certain.
- Allow me to paraphrase this sentence for you: 'If you want to be 100% certain that your attempt to heal someone's weakness is successful, you need to make sure that your Doctor skill is ≥ 10% multiplied by the level of that person. Otherwise, your attempt might be unsuccessful.'
- 3) What information? The first piece is already there (implied by the word 'ensure'); the second one is not worth mentioning. Imagine what would happen if we were to enumerate ALL the factors that do NOT matter at all as far as healing goes! The article would become extremely unclear and confusing. As a rule of thumb, if some piece of information is not relevant to something, it's probably not a very good idea to include it in the article on that something.
- Prof. Torr 15:33, 5 April 2012 (CEST)
Please, come to #2238wiki to discuss things. Ronillon (talk) 15:35, 29 May 2012 (CEST)
- Done.
Hi, don't know what is wrong with red links. They will turn blue, sooner or later. Ronillon (talk) 20:08, 29 May 2012 (CEST)
